Skip to main content
Back to Client Zero article
AI Visibility Audit Dashboard · Sample Deliverable

Client Zero — AISearch Global
AI Visibility Audit Results

Audit date: 20 June 2026  ·  Audited by: AISearch Global (self-audit)  ·  Industry: AEO & AI Search Consultancy  ·  Tools: AI Brand Perception Audit + Cloudflare Analytics + PageSpeed + WebPageTest

20 June 2026 Sydney, NSW, Australia aisearch.global Models: GPT-5.4 mini · Perplexity (real-time) · Gemini 3 Flash
This is a sample client deliverable. Every AISearch Global AI Visibility Audit includes a dashboard like this — built from your real data, not a template. Read the full story →

Mission Control

Visibility Audit Dashboard

Ten instruments, one panel. Click any signal below for the full readout — only one stays open at a time.

Click any card above to see the full readout

Audit Overview

Visibility Scorecard

Four headline numbers. The structural score reflects technical and content AEO signals. The AI Perception scores reflect what each AI platform actually knows — and says — about the brand right now.

Structural AEO
91/100
A Grade
Technical & content signals
▲ +72 from launch
ChatGPT
36/100
D Grade
AI Brand Perception
GPT-5.4 mini · Cutoff Aug 2025
Perplexity
30/100
F Grade
AI Brand Perception
Real-time web access
Gemini
41/100
D Grade
AI Brand Perception
Gemini 3 Flash · Cutoff Jan 2025

The Structural–Perception Gap

91
Structural AEO Score
36 / 30 / 41
AI Perception (ChatGPT / Perplexity / Gemini)

Technical AEO is in place. The gap is a temporal and citation problem — ChatGPT's training cut off August 2025 (before the site launched); Gemini's cut off January 2025. Perplexity has real-time access but the brand has minimal web citations yet. This gap closes as the brand accumulates citations, mentions, and structured entity data across the web. The signals are planted. The lag is normal. The trajectory is positive on all three platforms.

AI Platform Scores

Platform-by-Platform Perception

Each AI platform has a different knowledge cutoff, data source, and ranking algorithm. Results vary — and that variance is important signal.

What you're looking at: each dial shows that platform's score out of 100 — the further right the needle points, the stronger the brand's presence in that platform's answers. The tags underneath show how the AI categorises the brand (niche vs. established), the archetype it assigns, how confident it sounds, a 0–10 competitive market-fit score, and the current trend direction.

ChatGPT
GPT-5.4 mini · Knowledge cutoff: Aug 2025
0 50 100
36/100
AI Brand Perception
Niche brandInnovator archetype84% confidenceMarket: 6/10↑ Positive trajectory
Perplexity
Real-time web access · No training cutoff
0 50 100
30/100
AI Brand Perception
Niche brandInnovator archetype60% confidenceMarket: 6/10↑ Positive trajectory
Gemini
Gemini 3 Flash Preview · Knowledge cutoff: Jan 2025
0 50 100
41/100
AI Brand Perception
Niche brandInnovator archetype35% confidenceMarket: 6/10↑ High acceleration potential

Brand Recognition

How Well Each AI Platform Knows the Brand

Brand Recognition measures depth of knowledge — not just whether the AI has heard of the brand, but how confidently and accurately it can describe it. Sub-scores are rated out of 10.

ChatGPT
12/100
Mention Depth
2/10
Source Quality
3/10
Data Richness
2/10
NicheInnovator84% confident42 mentions
Perplexity
5/100
Mention Depth
1/10
Source Quality
2/10
Data Richness
1/10
NicheInnovator60% confident142 mentions
Gemini
12/100
Mention Depth
2/10
Source Quality
3/10
Data Richness
2/10
NicheInnovator35% confident1,240 mentions

Brand Positioning

Brand Archetype & Market Position

Beyond raw scores, each platform was asked to characterise the brand's market position and archetype. The consistency of the answer — even at low confidence — is itself a signal.

ChatGPT
Innovator
Niche brand · Market: 6/10
84%
Confidence
Perplexity
Innovator
Niche brand · Market: 6/10
60%
Confidence
Gemini
Innovator
Niche brand · Market: 6/10
35%
Confidence

Why this matters

All three platforms independently converge on the same archetype — Innovator — and the same niche-brand positioning, despite very different confidence levels and data sources. That convergence is a stronger signal than any single score: it means the entity data and content are communicating a consistent identity, even where mention depth is still thin. Confidence rises as citation volume grows — Perplexity's real-time access already tracks above its training-cutoff peers.

Sentiment Analysis

How AI Platforms Feel About the Brand

Sentiment is scored across four dimensions — General (overall tone), Contextual (relevance to AEO/AI-search topics), Source-Based (how credible the underlying citations are), and Polarization (divisive-framing risk). For the first three, higher is better. Polarization is a risk score, so lower (shown in amber) is better there. Gemini leads overall — likely because its training data includes positive industry framing from late 2024.

ChatGPT

54/100
General
52
Contextual
55
Source-Based
48
Polarization
28

Perplexity

45/100
General
42
Contextual
38
Source-Based
40
Polarization
24

Gemini

68/100
General
72
Contextual
65
Source-Based
67
Polarization
35

Competitive Share of Voice

Where the Brand Sits in AI Conversation

Share of Voice measures how often the brand is mentioned relative to competitors in AI responses about the category. A newly launched brand appearing in these datasets at all is a strong signal.

ChatGPT SOV

AISearch Global8%
WebFX18%
Ignite Visibility15%
NP Digital14%
Other45%
42 total mentions · 27 comparison queries

Perplexity SOV

AISearch Global18.5%
ThatWare22%
Gravitate15%
Warren Digital12%
Other32%
142 total mentions · 89 comparison queries

Gemini SOV

AISearch Global8.5%
Search Engine Land22%
Ahrefs18.5%
Semrush17%
Other34%
1,240 total mentions · 3,150 comparison queries

AI Crawler Activity

Which AI Bots Are Indexing the Site

Crawler activity from Cloudflare analytics (30-day period). AI crawler requests increased +2,600% in this period. The site is being actively indexed by major AI platforms — this is a leading indicator of future perception improvement.

What you're looking at: each row on the left is a distinct bot, ranked by how many requests it made in 30 days. Rows highlighted in colour (PerplexityBot, ChatGPT-User, Claude-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, OAI-SearchBot, GPTBot) are AI platforms reading the site to power answers; grey rows (Googlebot, CCBot, BingBot) are traditional search/training crawlers. The donut on the right shows the same six AI bots as a share of total crawl volume.

Crawl Requests by Bot (30-day)

GGooglebot
52
PPerplexityBot
16
CChatGPT-User
13
AClaude-SearchBot
7
CCCBot
5
AClaudeBot
4
BBingBot
2
OOAI-SearchBot
2
GGPTBot
1

AI Crawler Split

Key Signal

AI crawlers account for 43 of 108 total requests — 40% of all crawler activity. This is significantly above average for a 1-month-old domain.

+2,600%
AI crawler increase (30d)
6
AI bots crawling

Technical Performance

Site Speed & Infrastructure

Site performance affects AI crawlability, indexation frequency, and user experience signals. Cloudflare CDN caching is underperforming — a key action item.

What you're looking at: TTFB (Time to First Byte) and LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) measure server and page response speed — lower is better. PageSpeed Mobile is Google's 0–100 mobile performance score. Cache Rate is the share of requests served from Cloudflare's edge instead of the origin server — higher is better, and AI crawlers benefit most from a high cache rate since it means faster, more reliable access.

87ms
TTFB (Singapore)
✓ Excellent
688ms
LCP (WebPageTest)
✓ Excellent
92/100
PageSpeed Mobile
✓ Strong
33%
Cloudflare Cache Rate
⚠ Target: 70–85%

AEO Score Journey

Structural AEO: 19 → 91 in 6 Weeks

This tracks the structural AEO score from domain registration to audit date — showing the impact of each implementation layer.

Structural AEO Score Over Time

19
Domain registered
May 2026
45
Site + schema live
Late May
68
Content + FAQ published
Early Jun
91
Full AEO Traction Stack
20 Jun 2026
~95+
Citation growth
Q3 2026

Growth Roadmap

Priority Actions

Three action tracks in priority order. P1 has the most immediate impact on AI perception scores.

P1 · Immediate

Build Web Citations & Mentions

The structural foundation is solid — the next bottleneck is third-party citation volume: mentions in industry publications, directories, and content that AI platforms use as training signals. Perplexity's real-time index access means new citations show up almost immediately.

AI Brand Presence
Expected: +15–25pt AI perception improvement within 90 days
P2 · 30–60 Days

Fix Cloudflare Cache Rate

Cache rate sits at 33%, well under the 70–85% target — so AI crawlers are hitting origin servers more often than they should: slower, costlier, less reliable. A cache header and page-rule fix resolves this in days, not weeks.

Technical AEO
Expected: Faster AI re-indexation, lower origin load
P3 · Ongoing

Content Expansion for Citation Depth

Perplexity already shows 142 mentions — the highest of any platform — thanks to real-time access. Expanding structured content with statistics, quotes, and cite-worthy data points deepens source quality and mention-depth scores across the board.

Content Restructuring
Expected: Brand recognition sub-scores 2× improvement

This Is What Your Audit Looks Like

Every AISearch Global AI Visibility Audit delivers a dashboard like this — built from your real data, with a clear priority roadmap. Starting at $1,500 AUD.

Get Your AI Visibility Audit Read the Full Client Zero Story